Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and Minds—a Reply to John Beaudoin

Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):443-446 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In my paper “Intelligent Design Theory and the Supernatural—the ‘God or Extra-Terrestrial’ Reply,” I argued that Intelligent Design (ID) Theory, when coupled with independently plausible further assumptions, leads to the conclusion that a supernatural intelligent designer exists. ID theory is therefore not neutral on the question of whether there are supernatural agents. In this respect, it differs from the Darwinian theory of evolution. John Beaudoin replies to my paper in his “Sober on Intelligent Design Theory and the Intelligent Designer,” arguing that my paper faces two challenges. In the present paper, I try to address Beaudoin’s challenges.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
218 (#89,123)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elliott Sober
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

Intelligent design.William Hasker - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):586-597.

Add more citations