CounterText 1 (3) (2015)

Stephen Snyder
Tbilisi State University
Arthur Danto’s analytic theory of art relies on a form of artistic interpretation that requires access to the art theoretical concepts of the artworld, ‘an atmosphere of artistic theory, a knowledge of the history of art: an artworld’. Art, in what Danto refers to as post-history, has become theoretical, yet it is here contended that his explanation of the artist’s creative style lacks a theoretical dimension. This article examines Danto’s account of style in light of the role the artistic metaphor plays in the interpretation of the artwork, arguing that it is unable to account for the metaphorical power he claims is embedded within the work of art. An artist’s style issues from a unique perspective, the way an artist inhabits a specific spot in history. Though each person has such a perspective, when applied aesthetically, it is the key to the articulation of a unique historical meaning in the work of art. At the same time, artists’ knowledge of their contribution remains cut off from this perspective, for they are unaware of their self-manifestation of the historical concept of style. This article makes the case that Danto’s notion of style, based on Sartre’s notion of being-for-itself, cannot fulfil the role he allots it in his theory because, at some level, artists must apprehend their style to create a work of art capable of functioning critically as a countertext. It is only through the apprehension of their style, and dialogical activity that takes place between the artist and the beholders, that the unseen body of artworld theory is formed. Without this, when oriented to the aesthetic, style provides no concept or theory for the mind to behold. This article presents an alternative approach to style that recognizes the role of theory in the creation of metaphor, which would circumvent this problem.
Keywords Danto  Aristotle  Sartre  Habermas  metaphor  style  aesthetics  theory in style  being-for-itself  being-for-others
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.
Narration and Knowledge.Arthur C. Danto - 1982 - Philosophy and Literature 6 (1-2):17-32.
The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art.Guy Sircello - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (2):268.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Back in Style: A New Interpretation of Danto's Style Matrix.Frank Boardman - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (4):441-448.
Personal Style and Artistic Style.Nick Riggle - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261):711-731.
The Theory of the End of Art by Danto.Guangyao Liang - 2010 - Philosophy and Culture 37 (5):173-189.
Aesthetic Style as a Postructural Business Ethic.John Dobson - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 93 (3):393 - 400.
The Status of Style.Nelson Goodman - 1975 - Critical Inquiry 1 (4):799-811.
On Late Style: Arthur Danto’s the Abuse of Beauty.Diarmuid Costello - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):424-439.
Ludwik Fleck and the Concept of Style in the Natural Sciences.Claus Zittel - 2012 - Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):53-79.
Danto and His Critics.Mark Rollins (ed.) - 1993 - Wiley-Blackwell.


Added to PP index

Total views
794 ( #7,953 of 2,461,406 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #6,476 of 2,461,406 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes