Numbers and Cardinalities: What’s Really Wrong with the Easy Argument for Numbers?

Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (4):373-400 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates a certain puzzling argument concerning number expressions and their meanings, the Easy Argument for Numbers. After finding faults with previous views, I offer a new take on what’s ultimately wrong with the Argument: it equivocates. I develop a semantics for number expressions which relates various of their uses, including those relevant to the Easy Argument, via type-shifting. By marrying Romero ’s :687–737, 2005) analysis of specificational clauses with Scontras ’ semantics for Degree Nouns, I show how to extend Landman ’s Adjectival Theory to numerical specificational clauses. The resulting semantics can explain various contrasts observed by Moltmann, but only if Scontras’ contention that degrees and numbers are sortally distinct is correct. At the same time, the Easy Argument can establish its intended conclusion only if numbers and degrees are mistakenly assumed to be identical.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Focus on numbers.Jefferson Barlew - 2017 - Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (4):401-426.
What ‘the number of planets is eight’ means.Robert Knowles - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2757-2775.
On the Essence and Identity of Numbers.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2015 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (3):317-329.
What are numbers?Zvonimir Šikić - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):159-171.
Number words and reference to numbers.Katharina Felka - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):261-282.
An argument concerning the unknowable.Leon Horsten - 2009 - Analysis 69 (2):240-242.
Reference to numbers in natural language.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):499 - 536.
On the Question ‘Do Numbers Exist?’.Arthur W. Collins - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (190):23-36.
Multiple reductions revisited.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):244-255.
On the question 'do numbers exist?'.Arthur W. Collins - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (190):23-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-03

Downloads
54 (#264,075)

6 months
6 (#202,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Snyder
Ashoka University