Medical Crowdfunding for Unproven Medical Treatments: Should Gofundme Become a Gatekeeper?

Hastings Center Report 49 (6):32-38 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical crowdfunding has raised many ethical concerns, among them that it may undermine privacy, widen health inequities, and commodify health care. One motivation for medical crowdfunding has received particular attention among ethicists. Recent studies have shown that many individuals are using crowdfunding to finance access to scientifically unsupported medical treatments. Recently, GoFundMe prohibited campaigns for antivaccination groups on the grounds that they “promote misinformation about vaccines” and for treatment at a German clinic offering unproven cancer treatments due to “the need to make sure people are equipped to make well‐informed decisions.” GoFundMe has not taken any additional actions to regulate the much larger presence of campaigns seeking to fund unproven medical interventions on the platform. In this article, we make the ethical case for intervention by GoFundMe and other crowdfunding platforms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Medical crowdfunding in China: empirics and ethics.Pingyue Jin - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (8):538-544.
Saving Science by Doing Less of It?Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (6):2-2.
Before the law.Mark Eli Kalderon - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):219-244.
Autonomy and Negatively Informed Consent.Ulrik Kihlbom - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):146-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-09

Downloads
25 (#581,490)

6 months
7 (#285,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Inbar Cohen
University of Haifa
Jeremy Snyder
Simon Fraser University