Hastings Center Report 46 (6):36-42 (2016)

Authors
Jeremy Snyder
Simon Fraser University
Abstract
Crowdfunding websites allow users to post a public appeal for funding for a range of activities, including adoption, travel, research, participation in sports, and many others. One common form of crowdfunding is for expenses related to medical care. Medical crowdfunding appeals serve as a means of addressing gaps in medical and employment insurance, both in countries without universal health insurance, like the United States, and countries with universal coverage limited to essential medical needs, like Canada. For example, as of 2012, the website Gofundme had been used to raise a total of 8.8 million dollars for seventy-six hundred campaigns, the majority of which were health related. This money can make an important difference in the lives of crowdfunding users, as the costs of unexpected or uninsured medical needs can be staggering. In this article, I offer an overview of the benefits of medical crowdfunding websites and the ethical concerns they raise. I argue that medical crowdfunding is a symptom and cause of, rather than a solution to, health system injustices and that policy-makers should work to address the injustices motivating the use of crowdfunding sites for essential medical services. Despite the sites’ ethical problems, individual users and donors need not refrain from using them, but they bear a political responsibility to address the inequities encouraged by these sites. I conclude by suggesting some responses to these concerns and future directions for research.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/hast.645
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Commodifying the Polyvalent Good of Health Care.M. Cathleen Kaveny - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):207 – 223.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Medical Crowdfunding in China: Empirics and Ethics.Pingyue Jin - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (8):538-544.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Securing Access to Health Care a Report on the Ethical Implications of Differences in the Availability of Health Services.United States - 1983 - President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research for Sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
Summing Up Final Report on Studies of the Ethical and Legal Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.United States - 1983 - President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Medical Ethics.Alastair V. Campbell (ed.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Funding, Objectivity and the Socialization of Medical Research.James Robert Brown - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):295--308.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-11-23

Total views
25 ( #458,272 of 2,520,355 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,671 of 2,520,355 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes