Abstract
Stephen Darwall, Allan Gibbard, and Peter
Railton formulate two objections to moral sensibility theories
in their overview of twentieth-century moral theory,
“Toward Fin de siècle Ethics: Some Trends.” Instead of using
the work of sensibility theorists John McDowell and
David Wiggins to address these objections, I turn to H. A.
Prichard and P. F. Strawson. The reason for doing so is that
the objections misunderstand the importance of the idea of
the autonomy of the moral domain. Prichard and Strawson
have provided important defenses of this idea that are independent
of moral sensibility theories. Hence their work provides
independent grounds for answering the two objections.
Particularly important is the loosely a posteriori way they
make their arguments.