An empirical refutation of the direct realist theory of perception

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):437-438 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are currently two main philosophical theories of perception - Direct Realism and the Representative Theory. The former is supported by most contemporary philosophers, whereas the latter forms the groundwork for most scientific theories in this area. The paper describes a recent experiment involving retinal and cortical rivalry that provides strong empirical evidence that the Direct Realist theory is incorrect. There are of course a large number of related experiments on visual perception that would tend to lead us to the same conclusion, but the experiment described in this paper does so in a singularly direct and straightforward manner. Often the most telling experiments are the simplest

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,533

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An indirect defense of direct realism.Ryan Hickerson - 2004 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 25 (1):1-6.
Searle on Perception.Manuel Garcia-Carpintero - 1999 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):19-41.
Was Reid a Direct Realist?Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):302 - 323.
The Evidence Of The Senses: A Realist Theory Of Perception.David Kelley - 1986 - Baton Rouge: Louisiana St University Press.
Searle’s Refutation of Locke’s Representationalist Theory of Perception.S. Sreenish - 2024 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 41 (3):339-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
164 (#129,340)

6 months
7 (#542,440)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Mind in Science.Richard Gregory - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):525-529.

Add more references