NanoEthics 14 (1):1-19 (2020)

Discourses on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation, in short RI, have revolved around but not elaborated on the notion of critique. In this article, generative critique is introduced to RI as a practice that sits in-between adversarial armchair critique and co-opted, uncritical service. How to position oneself and be positioned on this spectrum has puzzled humanities scholars and social scientists who engage in interdisciplinary collaborations with scientists, engineers, and other professionals. Recently, generative critique has been presented as a solution to the puzzle in interdisciplinary collaborations on neuroscientific experiments. Generative critique seeks to create connections across disciplines that help remake seemingly stable objects in moments when taken-for-granted ways of seeing and approaching objects are unsettled. In order to translate generative critique from the neurosciences to RI, socio-technical integration research is proposed as a practice of generative critique in interdisciplinary RI collaborations. These collaborations aim to account for societal aspects in research and technology development. For this purpose, a variety of approaches have been developed, including STIR and video-reflexive ethnography. STIR and VRE resemble each other but diverge on affective, collaborative, and temporal dimensions. Their juxtaposition serves to develop suggestions for how STIR could be modified on these dimensions to better enact generative critique in interdisciplinary RI collaborations. In this way, the article contributes to ongoing discussions in RI and in the engaged programme in science and technology studies more broadly on the dynamics of positioning in collaborative work.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11569-019-00362-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource.René von Schomberg & Jonathan Hankins (eds.) - 2019 - Cheltenham, Royaume-Uni: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Why Critique Has Run Out of Steam.Bruno Latour - 2004 - Critical Inquiry 30 (2):225-248.
What’s New in the New Ideology Critique?Kirun Sankaran - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (5):1441-1462.
Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.Harry Collins, Robert Evans & Mike Gorman - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (4):657-666.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Explanation in Linguistics a Critique of Generative Grammar.Morton Emanuel Winston - 1982 - Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Constructivism and Technology Critique: Replies to Critics.Andrew Feenberg - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):225 – 237.
Research Skills for the Future: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.Rick Szostak - 2013 - Journal of Research Practice 9 (1):Article V3.
Qu'est-ce que la critique de l'idéologie?Rahel Jaeggi - 2008 - Actuel Marx 43 (1):96-108.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,203,408 of 2,506,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes