Theories of State Formation and Civilisation in Johann P. Arnason and Shmuel Eisenstadt's Comparative Sociologies of Japan

Critical Horizons 3 (2):225-251 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Johann Arnason and Shmuel Eisenstadt's social theories have remarkably different origins. Yet each has moved onto common ground with the other over a period of time. They meet in historical sociology in dialogue over theories of state formation and images of civilisation. Each is engaged in a project of revising civilisations sociology that reaches an apex with the comparative study of Japan.Their groundbreaking contributions can be read critically against a wider background of debates about postcolonialism, the reputation of the notion of civilisation and the state of area studies in the humanities and social sciences.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,439

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ideal of civilisation: Its origins and socio‐political character.Brett Bowden - 2004 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1):25-50.
Two Civilizational Doctrines. Koneczny and Majewski.Robert Piotrowski - 2007 - Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 52.
Realist social theorising and the emergence of state educational systems.Tone Skinningsrud - 2006 - In Clive Lawson, John Latsis & Nuno Martins (eds.), Contributions to Social Ontology. New York: Routledge. pp. 339-365.


Added to PP

31 (#512,630)

6 months
9 (#454,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Smith
Colorado State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dukhŭt na Prosveshtenieto.Tzvetan Todorov - 2009 - Sofii︠a︡: Universitetsko izdatelstvo "Sv. Kliment Okhridski".

Add more references