The Methods of Science and Religion: Epistemologies in Conflict

Lanham: Lexington Books (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Methods of Science and Religion is a philosophical analysis of the conflict between science and religion, which challenges the popular, contemporary view that science and religion are complementary worldviews. It exposes their methodological incompatibility and concludes that religious modes of investigation are unreliable.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

BL240.3

ISBN(s)

9781498582384   1498582397   1498582389
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science and Religion: A Conflict of Methods.Tiddy Smith - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Otago
The Plight of Aesthetics in Iran.Heidari Majid - 2016 - Contemporary Aesthetics 14.
Science, Religion, and Naturalism: Metaphysical and Methodological Incompatibilities.Marin Mahner - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1793-1835.
The Real Conflict Between Science and Religion: Alvin Plantinga’s Ignoratio Elenchi.Herman Philipse - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):87--110.
Science and Religion in Harmony.Deborah B. Haarsma - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 105--119.
Religia i nauka: dwie prawdy?Andrzej Bronk - 2006 - Filozofia Nauki 1.
Whose Science and Whose Religion? Reflections on the Relations between Scientific and Religious Worldviews.Stuart Glennan - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):797-812.
On the autonomy of scientific and theological discourses.Igor Nevvazhay - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 53 (3):140-151.
Relocating the Conflict Between Science and Religion at the Foundations of the History of Science.James C. Ungureanu - 2018 - Zygon 53 (4):1106-1130.
Beyond conflict and reduction: between philosophy, science, and religion.William Desmond, John Steffen & Koen Decoster (eds.) - 2001 - Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism.Alvin Plantinga - 2011 - New York, US: OUP Usa.
The Alleged Demise of Religion: Greatly Exaggerated Reports from the Science/Religion “Wars”.Del Ratzsch - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 69--84.
Science and Religion: Why Does the Debate Continue?Alvin Plantinga - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 299--316.
A Critique of Alvin Plantinga’s Speech: ‘’Science and Religion: Where the Conflict Really Lies?’’.Sümeyra Turan - 2018 - Tasavvur - Tekirdag Theology Journal 4 (1):405-415.
Falsification and Belief: SCHUBERT M. OGDEN.Schubert M. Ogden - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (1):21-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-01

Downloads
55 (#284,906)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic circularity.William P. Alston - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (1):1-30.

View all 8 references / Add more references