Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):567-568 (2004)

Although an excellent review, the target article displays a bias in favor of reciprocity-based explanations and against alternatives. Tolerated scrounging is more subtle and pervasive than portrayed here. Costly signaling need not be limited to public displays and generalized sharing. The theoretical basis for extensive sharing and other forms of collective action remains unresolved, and standard reciprocity-based explanations are insufficient.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x04300129
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #370,915 of 2,519,690 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,690 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes