Reflections on the Hockney-Falco Thesis: Optical Theory and Artistic Practice in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries

Early Science and Medicine 10 (2):163-186 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One problem facing Hockney and Falco is the lack of evidence among optical sources to support their claim that artists used image-projection by the early 1400s. After all, if quattrocento artists knew about image-projection, they must have learned about it from experts in the field, and no one was more expert at the time than Perspectivist opticians. As I argue in this paper, however, Perspectivist reflection-analysis posed certain theoretical and conceptual constraints that would have prevented Perspectivist opticians from recognizing, much less understanding, image-projection. Their silence on this matter is therefore not evidence against the Hockney-Falco thesis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hockney's Secret Knowledge, Vanvitelli's Camera Obscura.Christoph Lüthy - 2005 - Early Science and Medicine 10 (2):315-339.
The mirror and painting in early Renaissance texts.Yvonne Yiu - 2005 - Early Science and Medicine 10 (2):187-210.
Reconstruction of the Optical Revolution: Lakatos vs. Laudan.Xiang Chen - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:103 - 109.
Kepler’s optics without hypotheses.Sven Dupré - 2012 - Synthese 185 (3):501-525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
19 (#778,470)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references