Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (2):188-218 (2021)

Authors
Will Smith
University of Pennsylvania
Robert N. Audi
University of Notre Dame
Abstract
Debates about the ethics of health care and medical research in contemporary pluralistic democracies often arise partly from competing religious and secular values. Such disagreements raise challenges of balancing claims of religious liberty with claims to equal treatment in health care. This paper proposes several mid-level principles to help in framing sound policies for resolving such disputes. We develop and illustrate these principles, exploring their application to conscientious objection by religious providers and religious institutions, accommodation of religious priorities in biomedical research, and treatment of patients’ religious views in doctor–patient encounters. Given that no sound set of guiding principles yields precise solutions for every policy dispute, we explore how morally sound democracies might deliberatively resolve such policy issues, following our proposed principles. Taken together and carefully interpreted, these principles may help in guiding difficult decision making in the indefinitely large realm where government, medical providers, and patients encounter problems concerning religion and medicine.
Keywords conscience  mid-level principle  normative principles  professional obligations  religious accommodation  special obligations
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhaa038
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.
The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
What is the Point of Equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly.Norman Daniels - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 81 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Whose (Ir)Religion? Which Bioethics?Benjamin N. Parks - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (2):147-155.
Considerations of Conscience.Bryan Pilkington - 2021 - HEC Forum 33 (3):165-174.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On What Grounds Should Religious Practices Be Accommodated?Stéphane Courtois - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 61:43-48.
On What Grounds Should Religious Practices Be Accommodated?Stéphane Courtois - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:87-92.
Religious Accommodation.Jonathan Seglow - 2019 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):15-36.
A Theory of Religious Accommodation.Paul Bou-Habib - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):109–126.
Accommodating Religion and Shifting Burdens.Peter Jones - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):515-536.
Understanding the Trusted Doctor and Constructing a Theory of Bioethics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):493-504.
Conscience Rights and “Effective Referral” in Ontario.Carter Anne McGowan - 2018 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18 (2):255-268.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-02

Total views
53 ( #211,979 of 2,498,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #48,537 of 2,498,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes