Paradoxes of Dehumanization

Social Theory and Practice 42 (2):416-443 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In previous writings, I proposed that we dehumanize others by attributing the essence of a less-than-human creature to them, in order to disable inhibitions against harming them. However, this account is inconsistent with the fact that dehumanizers implicitly, and often explicitly, acknowledge the human status of their victims. I propose that when we dehumanize others, we regard them as simultaneously human and subhuman. Drawing on the work of Ernst Jentsch, Mary Douglas, and Noël Carroll, I argue that the notion of dehumanized people as metaphysically transgressive provides important insights into the distinctive phenomenology of dehumanization.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

216 (#96,935)

6 months
32 (#106,250)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Basic Equality.Paul Sagar - 2024 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Toxic Speech: Inoculations and Antidotes.Lynne Tirrell - 2018 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 56 (S1):116-144.
AI Recruitment Algorithms and the Dehumanization Problem.Megan Fritts & Frank Cabrera - 2021 - Ethics and Information Technology (4):1-11.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references