“None of the arts that gives proofs about some nature is interrogative”: Questions and Aristotle's concept of science


Authors
Robin Smith
Texas A&M University
Abstract
Modern interpreters have often regarded Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics as a mystery, or even a bit of an embarrassment. In his treatises on natural science and ethics, Aristotle is constantly concerned to review the opinions of his predecessors and of people in general; where appropriate, he also takes note of experiential observations, some of them highly specialized. However, the traditional view of the Posterior Analytics is that it advances an almost Cartesian picture of sciences as deductive systems founded on intuitively evident first premises. How are these to be reconciled?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

¿Se Puede Considerar Formal la Lógica de Aristóteles?José María Llovet Abascal - 2021 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 82:99-113.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
668 ( #11,979 of 2,518,492 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,492 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes