Non-human Animals as Research Participants: Ethical Practice in Animal Assisted Interventions and Research in Aotearoa/New Zealand

In Catriona Ida Macleod, Jacqueline Marx, Phindezwa Mnyaka & Gareth J. Treharne, The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 99-115 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter we outline the need to develop ethical frameworks to guide research on the role of animal-orientated health, therapeutic, and service interventions. We discuss findings from our research on uses of animals in therapeutic settings and benefits of human–canine interactions for human health. These stories from the field reveal that current ethics review processes do not recognise the animal as an equal partner in the potential reciprocal benefits and risks of therapeutic human–animal relationships. We explore how these review processes frame research on the relationships between humans and non-human animals and use the ethical review system of Aotearoa/New Zealand as an example. We propose an ethical framework that goes beyond animal welfare legislation and recognises a range of non-human animal capacities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,218

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
32 (#774,274)

6 months
8 (#501,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Emma Tumilty
University of Texas Medical Branch
Catherine M. M. Smith
Cornell University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references