Abstract
A market may be defined as a set of competitive relationships in which agents strive, within limits set by ground rules, to better their own economic positions, not necessarily at the expense of other people, but not necessarily not at their expense either. A degree of indifference to the market fates of others is, manifestly, an inevitable feature of the market practice, so defined. But though indifference is clearly logically endemic to markets, it has been denied that selfishness is necessarily involved in the raw competition of market activity. Thus, Hayek maintains that market behaviour is not selfish on the grounds that the market is a competitive non zero-sum ‘wealth-creating game’ in which individuals ‘use their own knowledge for their own ends’ in a system whose operations, via the ‘Invisible Hand’, also produce unintended benefits for others. But for behaviour to be selfish it clearly need not necessarily disbenefit other people; it is enough that it is pursued, or persisted in, regardless of its effects upon others. And this is precisely what the institutional ‘indifference’ of market activity amounts to. Admittedly individuals who understand the Hayekian logic of the market know that the long-run chances of everyone's benefiting are maximized by acting in a rigorously competitive manner, and so they at least in one sense act with a ‘regard for others’. But ipso facto this category of market agents has an even stronger reason than the ignorantly selfish for disregarding the specific interests of all the particular individuals with whom they have economically to do. ‘Market selfishness’, the disregard for others' market interests, is thus a logically inevitable feature of market activity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246100004872
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Hayek on Liberty.John Gray - 1986 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 48 (4):662-662.
Spheres of Intimacy and the Adam Smith Problem.Russell Nieli - 1986 - Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (4):611.
Mill's and Other Liberalisms.John Gray - 1988 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 2 (2-3):12-35.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Market Freedom as Antipower.Robert S. Taylor - 2013 - American Political Science Review 107 (3):593-602.
The Moral Standing of the Market.Amartya Sen - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):1.
Business Ethics in a Competitive Market.Julianne Nelson - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (9):663 - 666.
Are Markets Morally Free Zones?Daniel M. Hausman - 1989 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (4):317-333.
Alienation and Market Socialism.Philip J. Kain - 2014 - The Owl of Minerva 46 (1/2):79-83.
Virtuous Markets: The Market as School of the Virtues.Maitland Ian - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (1):17-31.
Entrepreneurs, Profits, and Deserving Market Shares.John Christman - 1988 - Social Philosophy and Policy 6 (1):1.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-23

Total views
46 ( #246,220 of 2,507,403 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,403 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes