Angelaki 23 (4):11-18 (2018)

Elise Woodard
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
In this text, Jacques Rancière critically discusses the work of Georges Didi-Huberman on images. He disagrees with various claims seemingly made by Didi-Huberman about images, such as that they can “take position” or that they are “active.” Rancière argues that Didi-Huberman adds another form of dialectics to the simpler form of dialectics adopted by Bertolt Brecht and Harun Farocki in their works, namely one that also involves a layering of different temporalities. However, both in Brecht’s War Primer and in Didi-Huberman’s analysis of it, all the potencies credited to images as such are actually potencies of the words that accompany the images. Rancière comes to the conclusion that to “put images in motion,” as Didi-Huberman wants to do, or to regard them as being “active,” he has to put words, his own poetic and extensive writings, in motion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0969725x.2018.1497265
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In the Image of Auschwitz.Bruno Chaouat - 2006 - Diacritics 36 (1):86-96.
Georges didi-huberman: Une esthétique du symptôme.Maud Hagelstein - 2005 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 34:81-96.


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #222,389 of 2,462,071 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,185 of 2,462,071 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes