Iwant in this chapter to consider the kind of morality we would have reason to believe if it were the case that we inhabit a naturalistic universe. In particular, I want to consider whether in a naturalistic cosmos we would have reason to believe—as very many modern people in fact do—in universal benevolence and human rights as moral facts and imperatives
In Jeffrey Schloss & Michael J. Murray (eds.), The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 292 (2009)
AbstractThis article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant's Moral Philosophy.Paul Guyer - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):444 – 464.
Is the Naturalistic Fallacy Dead (and If So, Ought It Be?).Oren Harman - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (3):557 - 572.
Naturalistic Cognition: A Research Paradigm for Human-Centered Design.Peter Storkerson - 2010 - Journal of Research Practice 6 (2):Article M12.
A Biological Alternative to Moral Explanations.Joseph Millum - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):385-407.
The Fact of Reason. Kant’s Passage to Ordinary Moral Knowledge.Paweł Łuków - 1993 - Kant Studien 84 (2):204-221.
The Objectivity of Ethics and the Unity of Practical Reason.Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek & Peter Singer - 2012 - Ethics 123 (1):9-31.
Ruse's Darwinian Meta-Ethics: A Critique. [REVIEW]Peter Woolcock - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):423-439.
Human Rights and Human Dignity: A Reply to Doris Schroeder. [REVIEW]Peter Schaber - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):155-161.
Really Taking Darwin and the Naturalistic Fallacy Seriously: An Objection to Rottschaefer and Martinsen. [REVIEW]Jonathan Barrett - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):433-437.
A Certain Kind of Moral Scepticism and the Foundations of Human Rights.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2006 - Law and Justice 157:39-53.