Fuzzy Logic and Higher-Order Vagueness

In Petr Cintula, Chris Fermüller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hájek (eds.), Logical Models of Reasoning with Vague Information. pp. 1--19 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The major reason given in the philosophical literature for dissatisfaction with theories of vagueness based on fuzzy logic is that such theories give rise to a problem of higherorder vagueness or artificial precision. In this paper I first outline the problem and survey suggested solutions: fuzzy epistemicism; measuring truth on an ordinal scale; logic as modelling; fuzzy metalanguages; blurry sets; and fuzzy plurivaluationism. I then argue that in order to decide upon a solution, we need to understand the true nature and source of the problem. Two possible sources are discussed: the problem stems from the very nature of vagueness—from the defining features of vague predicates; or the problem stems from the way in which the meanings of predicates are determined—by the usage of speakers together with facts about their environment and so on. I argue that the latter is the true source of the problem, and on this basis that fuzzy plurivaluationism is the correct solution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on 'Fuzzy Logic and Higher-Order Vagueness' by Nicholas J.J. Smith.Libor Běhounek - 2011 - In Petr Cintula, Christian G. Fermüller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hájek (eds.), Understanding Vagueness: Logical, Philosophical, and Linguistic Perspectives. College Publications. pp. 21-8.
Comments on 'Fuzzy Logic and Higher-Order Vagueness' by Nicholas J.J. Smith.Francesco Paoli - 2011 - In Petr Cintula, Christian G. Fermüller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hájek (eds.), Understanding Vagueness: Logical, Philosophical, and Linguistic Perspectives. College Publications. pp. 33-5.
Reply to Libor Běhounek’s Comments on 'Fuzzy Logic and Higher-Order Vagueness'.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2011 - In Petr Cintula, Christian G. Fermüller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hájek (eds.), Understanding Vagueness: Logical, Philosophical, and Linguistic Perspectives. College Publications. pp. 29-32.
Reply to Francesco Paoli’s Comments on 'Fuzzy Logic and Higher-Order Vagueness'.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2011 - In Petr Cintula, Christian G. Fermüller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hájek (eds.), Understanding Vagueness: Logical, Philosophical, and Linguistic Perspectives. College Publications. pp. 37-40.
Vagueness.Nicholas Jeremy Josef Smith - 2001 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Vagueness and blurry sets.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (2):165-235.
Towards Fuzzy Linguistic Logic Programming.Clemente Rubio-Manzano & Pascual Julian-Iranzo - 2014 - Archives for the Philosophy and History of Soft Computing 2014 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-10

Downloads
176 (#114,833)

6 months
15 (#185,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas J. J. Smith
University of Sydney

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Vagueness and contradiction.Roy A. Sorensen - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference.Hartry Field - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (14):462-481.
Vagueness and Contradiction.Roy Sorensen - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):695-703.
On the coherence of vague predicates.Crispin Wright - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):325--65.

View all 24 references / Add more references