Determinism and prepunishment: The radical nature of compatibilism

Analysis 67 (4):347–349 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I shall argue that compatibilism cannot resist in a principled way the temptation to prepunish people. Compatibilism thus emerges as a much more radical view than it is typically presented and perceived, and is seen to be at odds with fundamental moral intuitions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
140 (#127,731)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saul Smilansky
University of Haifa

References found in this work

Time and Punishment.Christopher New - 1992 - Analysis 52 (1):35 - 40.
The Time to Punish.Saul Smilansky - 1994 - Analysis 54 (1):50 - 53.
Punishing Times: Reply to Smilansky.Christopher New - 1995 - Analysis 55 (1):60 - 62.

Add more references