Can Intelligent Design Become Respectable?

Reports of the National Center for Science Education 20 (4):40-43 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism.Reed Richter - 2002 - Reports of the National Center for Science Education 22 (Jan-Apr 2002):18-22.
Intelligent design theory, religion, and the science curriculum.Warren A. Nord - 2003 - In John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.), Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. pp. 45--58.
Darwinism, design, and public education.John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.) - 2003 - East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Steve Fuller and Intelligent Design.Jeremy Shearmur - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):433-445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-06

Downloads
28 (#788,995)

6 months
3 (#1,465,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kelly Smith
Clemson University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references