Angelaki 23 (4):1-2 (2018)

In this text, Jacques Rancière critically discusses the work of Georges Didi-Huberman on images. He disagrees with various claims seemingly made by Didi-Huberman about images, such as that they can “take position” or that they are “active.” Rancière argues that Didi-Huberman adds another form of dialectics to the simpler form of dialectics adopted by Bertolt Brecht and Harun Farocki in their works, namely one that also involves a layering of different temporalities. However, both in Brecht’s War Primer and in Didi-Huberman’s analysis of it, all the potencies credited to images as such are actually potencies of the words that accompany the images. Rancière comes to the conclusion that to “put images in motion,” as Didi-Huberman wants to do, or to regard them as being “active,” he has to put words, his own poetic and extensive writings, in motion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0969725x.2018.1497262
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Visible and the Invisible.B. Falk - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (80):278-279.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Image, Matière : Immanence.Georges Didi-Huberman - 2002 - Rue Descartes 38 (4):86.
In the Image of Auschwitz.Bruno Chaouat - 2006 - Diacritics 36 (1):86-96.
Georges didi-huberman: Une esthétique du symptôme.Maud Hagelstein - 2005 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 34:81-96.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #848,933 of 2,498,992 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,992 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes