Oxford University Press UK (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This book explores a question central to philosophy--namely, what does it take for a belief to be justified or rational? According to a widespread view, whether one has justification for believing a proposition is determined by how probable that proposition is, given one's evidence. In this book this view is rejected and replaced with another: in order for one to have justification for believing a proposition, one's evidence must normically support it--roughly, one's evidence must make the falsity of that proposition abnormal in the sense of calling for special, independent explanation. This conception of justification bears upon a range of topics in epistemology and beyond. Ultimately, this way of looking at justification guides us to a new, unfamiliar picture of how we should respond to our evidence and manage our own fallibility. This picture is developed here.
|
Keywords | justification probability normic support |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy this book | $76.00 new Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 9780198755333 0198755333 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
The Relationship Between Belief and Credence.Elizabeth G. Jackson - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (6):1–13.
Rehabilitating Statistical Evidence.Lewis Ross - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (1):3-23.
The normality of error.Sam Carter & Simon Goldstein - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (8):2509-2533.
View all 88 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Basic Notion of Justification.Jonathan L. Kvanvig & Christopher Menzel - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 59 (3):235-261.
Justifying Circumstances and Moore-Paradoxical Beliefs: A Response to Brueckner.John N. Williams - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):490-496.
Rational Faith and Justified Belief.Lara Buchak - 2014 - In Timothy O'Connor & Laura Frances Callahan (eds.), Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue. Oxford University Press. pp. 49-73.
Can Probability Be Subjective and Objective at the Same Time? A Reply to Arnold Baise.Mark Crovelli - 2011 - Libertarian Papers 3.
Peer Disagreement, Evidence, and Well-Groundedness.Han van Wietmarschen - 2013 - Philosophical Review 122 (3):395-425.
A Priori Justification and Experience.Jamie Carlin Watson - 2009 - Dissertation, Florida State University
The Need for Justification.Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (2):201-210.
Responsibilist Evidentialism.Christopher Michael Cloos - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (11):2999-3016.
Dynamic Coherence and Probability Kinematics.Brian Skyrms - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):1-20.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-10-14
Total views
2,703 ( #1,431 of 2,505,176 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
221 ( #2,393 of 2,505,176 )
2015-10-14
Total views
2,703 ( #1,431 of 2,505,176 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
221 ( #2,393 of 2,505,176 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads