Bowl climbing: The logic of religious question rivalry [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (1):27 - 43 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Religious positions can differ more deeply in asking rival questions than in offering rival answers to a common question. What is the logic of basic question rivalry? Questions are rivals when they make incompatible assumptions and one has to choose between them. The more basic the questions the greater the discontinuity that switching between them might bring to one's life. Choice of questions must fit the overall aim of whichever question is taken to be least avoidable. Avoidableness depends partly on the subject's attitude; for a subject with pious scruples, a religious question shift entails a revolution of loyalty that a "paradigm shift" does not.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#811,313)

6 months
2 (#1,114,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references