Are we only five minutes old? Acock on the age of the universe

Philosophy of Science 51 (3):511-513 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Malcolm Acock attempts to show that three widely accepted “solutions” to the philosophical problem of theory choice between the ordinary account of the age of the universe, and “Russell's hypothesis” that the world sprang into existence five minutes ago, are unsatisfactory. In the following paper we shall attempt to show why “Russell's hypothesis” is defective as a cosmological explanation of the age of the universe.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#335,929)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

More on Russell's hypothesis.Hilton Hinderliter - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):703-711.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Analysis of Mind.Bertrand Russell - 1921/1922 - Mind 31 (121):85-97.
Other dates.Ronald J. Butler - 1959 - Mind 68 (269):16-33.
The age of the universe.Malcolm Acock - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (1):130-145.
I.—Statements about the Past: The Presidential Address.A. J. Ayer - 1952 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52 (1):i-xx.

Add more references