Appealing to Ignorance Behind the Cloak of Ambiguity

In Robert T. Pennock (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientifc Perspectives. MIT Press. pp. 705-35 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientifc Perspectives.Robert T. Pennock (ed.) - 2001 - MIT Press.
Creation and Evolution: A Modest Proposal.Alvin Plantinga - 2001 - In Robert T. Pennock (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientifc Perspectives. MIT Press.
Pennock, Robert T., ed. Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. [REVIEW]Brendan Sweetman - 2003 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 3 (3):640-642.
Robert T. Pennock, ed., Intelligent Design Creationism and its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Niall Shanks - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23 (4):270-272.
It Ain’t Necessarily So: An Essay Review of Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives*Robert T. Pennock , Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , xx + 805 pp., $45.00. [REVIEW]George Nakhnikian - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):593-604.
The problems with creationism.Massimo Pigliucci - 2007 - In A. J. Petto & L. R. Godfrey (eds.), Scientists Confront Intelligent Design and Creationism. Norton.
God of the gaps: the argument from ignorance and the limits of methodological naturalism.Robert T. Pennock - 2007 - In A. J. Petto & L. R. Godfrey (eds.), Scientists Confront Intelligent Design and Creationism. Norton. pp. 309--338.
The science question in intelligent design.Sahotra Sarkar - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):291-305.
Theological Consequences of the Theory of Intelligent Design: Thesis.Terence Crotty & Vivian Boland - 2002 - [S.N.].

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-06

Downloads
22 (#952,742)

6 months
5 (#992,332)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kelly Smith
Clemson University

Citations of this work

The Role of Metaphysical Naturalism in Science.Martin Mahner - 2012 - Science & Education 21 (10):1437–1459.
Methodological naturalism and its misconceptions.Tiddy Smith - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82 (3):321-336.
Can Science Test Supernatural Worldviews?Yonatan I. Fishman - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):813-837.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references