The Monist 100 (3):357-372 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Traditional debates, such as those regarding whether the universe is finite in spatial or temporal extent, exemplified, according to Kant, the inherent tendency of pure reason to lead us astray. Although various aspects of Kant’s arguments fail to find a footing in modern cosmology, Kant’s objections to the search for a complete objective description of the cosmos are related to three intertwined issues that are still of central importance: the applicability of universal laws, the status of distinctively cosmological laws, and the explanatory sufficiency of laws. We will advocate a broadly Kantian position on these three issues as part of a critical response to a prevalent strain of Leibnizian rationalism in contemporary cosmology.
|
Keywords | Philosophy of Cosmology Laws of Nature Kant |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/monist/onx015 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Philosophy of Cosmology.Chris Smeenk - 2013 - In Robert Batterman (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 607-652.
Kant's Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.Michael Friedman - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Can We Know the Global Structure of Spacetime?John Byron Manchak - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (1):53-56.
Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes.John Earman - 1995 - Oxford University Press USA.
Theory and Truth: Philosophical Critique Within Foundational Science.Lawrence Sklar - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
View all 21 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Concept of the Universe in Physical Cosmology.Raúl Fernández-Cobos - 2021 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 52 (4):523-542.
What Is the Spatiotemporal Extension of the Universe? Underdetermination According to Kant’s First Antinomy and in Present-Day Cosmology.Claus Beisbart - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):286-307.
Similar books and articles
Kant and the Laws of Nature.Michela Massimi & Angela Breitenbach (eds.) - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
Can Kantian Laws Be Broken? Kant on Miracles.Andrew Chignell - 2014 - Res Philosophica 91 (1):103-121.
Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws.Michael Bennett McNulty - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:1-10.
The Comprehensible Cosmos: Where Do the Laws of Physics Come From?Victor J. Stenger - 2006 - Prometheus Books.
Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
Concepts as Involving Laws and Inconceivable Without Them.Wilfrid Sellars - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (October):287-313.
Nomological and Transcendental Criteria for Scientific Laws.Predrag Šustar - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):533-544.
Laws of Nature and the Universe: Philosophical Implications of Modern Cosmology.Yuri V. Balashov - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Laws and Meta-Laws of Nature: Conservation Laws and Symmetries.Marc Lange - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):457-481.
The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals.James R. O'Shea - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):216 – 254.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-06-17
Total views
65 ( #175,990 of 2,505,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,577 of 2,505,142 )
2017-06-17
Total views
65 ( #175,990 of 2,505,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,577 of 2,505,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads