Relativistic Conceptions of Trustworthiness: Implications for the Trustworthy Status of National Identification Systems

Data and Policy 4 (e21):1-16 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Trustworthiness is typically regarded as a desirable feature of national identification systems (NISs); but the variegated nature of the trustor communities associated with such systems makes it difficult to see how a single system could be equally trustworthy to all actual and potential trustors. This worry is accentuated by common theoretical accounts of trustworthiness. According to such accounts, trustworthiness is relativized to particular individuals and particular areas of activity, such that one can be trustworthy with regard to some individuals in respect of certain matters, but not trustworthy with regard to all trustors in respect of every matter. The present article challenges this relativistic approach to trustworthiness by outlining a new account of trustworthiness, dubbed the expectation-oriented account. This account allows for the possibility of an absolutist (or one-place) approach to trustworthiness. Such an account, we suggest, is the approach that best supports the effort to develop NISs. To be trustworthy, we suggest, is to minimize the error associated with trustor expectations in situations of social dependency (commonly referred to as trust situations), and to be trustworthy in an absolute sense is to assign equal value to all expectation-related errors in all trust situations. In addition to outlining the features of the expectation-oriented account, we describe some of the implications of this account for the design, development, and management of trustworthy NISs.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

e-Trust and reputation.Thomas W. Simpson - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (1):29-38.
Xin: Being Trustworthy.Winnie Sung - 2020 - International Philosophical Quarterly 60 (3):271-286.
Trust and Trustworthiness.Stephen Wright - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (3):615-627.
A role for business ethics in facilitating trustworthiness.N. F. Bews & G. J. Rossouw - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (4):377 - 390.
Trustworthiness of autonomous systems.S. Kate Devitt - 2018 - In Hussein A. Abbass, Jason Scholz & Darryn Reid (eds.), Foundations of Trusted Autonomous Systems. Springer. pp. 161-184.
On the Roles of Trustworthiness and Acceptance.Marian David - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):93-107.
On the Roles of Trustworthiness and Acceptance.Marian David - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):93-107.
Trustworthiness and Moral Character.Thomas W. Simpson - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):543-557.
Trustworthiness.Karen Jones - 2012 - Ethics 123 (1):61-85.
Confucian Trustworthiness and the Practice of Business in China.Daryl Koehn - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (3):415-429.
Trustworthiness: An Aristotelian Analysis of a Virtue.Nancy Potter - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-05

Downloads
256 (#72,267)

6 months
71 (#54,531)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Smart
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Trust and antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.
How to speak of the colors.Mark Johnston - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 68 (3):221-263.
Trust.Carolyn McLeod - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability.Mark Ryan - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2749-2767.
How to Be Trustworthy.Katherine Hawley - 2019 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references