The contribution of linguistics to legal interpretation

In The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Brian G. Slocum - 2017 - In The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy.Brian G. Slocum (ed.) - 2017 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Linguistic knowledge and legal interpretation: what goes right, what goes wrong.Lawrence M. Solan - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Philosophy of language, linguistics, and possible lessons about originalism.Kent Greenawalt - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Legal speech and the elements of adjudication.Nicholas Allott & Benjamin Shaer - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The continued relevance of philosophical hermeneutics in legal thought.Frank S. Ravitch - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Getting over the originalist fixation.I. I. I. Francis J. Mootz - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Deferentialism and adjudication.Gideon Rosen - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Deferentialism, living originalism, and the constitution.Scott Soames - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Response to chapter ten : comments on Rosen.Scott Soames - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Originalism, hermeneutics, and the fixation thesis.Lawrence B. Solum - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The strange fate of Holmes's normal speaker of English.Karen Petroski - 2017 - In Brian G. Slocum (ed.), The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Institutional Turn in Theories of Legal Interpretation.Bojan Spaić - 2019 - In David Duarte, Pedro Moniz Lopes & Jorge Silva Sampaio (eds.), Legal Interpretation and Scientific Knowledge. Springer Verlag. pp. 187-209.
Un enfoque semiótico Y pragmático de la interpretación de textos jurídicos.José López Hernández - 2008 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 42:135-152.
Corpus Linguistics in Legal Discourse.Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski - 2021 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 34 (5):1515-1540.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-09

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references