From enlightenment to receptivity: rethinking our values

New York: Oxford University Press (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This new book by Michael Slote argues that Western philosophy on the whole has overemphasized rational control and autonomy at the expense of the important countervailing value and virtue of receptivity. Recently the ideas of caring and empathy have received a great deal of philosophical and public attention, but both these notions rest on the deeper and broader value of receptivity, and in From Enlightenment to Receptivity, Slote seeks to show that we need to focus more on receptivity if we are to attain a more balanced sense and understanding of what is important to us. Beginning with a critique of Enlightenment thinking that calls into question its denial of any central role to considerations of emotion and empathy, he goes on to show how a greater emphasis on these factors and on the receptivity that underlies them can give us a more realistic, balanced, and sensitive understanding of our core ethical and epistemological values. This means rejecting post-modernism's blanket rejection of reason and of compelling real values and recognizing, rather, that receptivity should play a major role in how we lead our lives as individuals, in how we relate to nature, in how we acquire knowledge about the world, and in how we relate morally and politically with others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Empathy and Objectivity

Enlightenment thinking and most recent philosophy in the English-speaking world have downplayed or ignored the role of emotion and empathy in epistemology and the philosophy of mind. But objectivity and open-mindedness are epistemic virtues that are involved in full epistemic rationality, ... see more

Similar books and articles

Receptivity to Mystery: Cultivation, Loss, and Scientism.Ian James Kidd - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (3):51-68.
Situating receptivity: From critique to 'reflective disclosure'.Morton Schoolman - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (9):1033-1041.
Building Receptivity: Leopold's Land Ethic and Critical Feminist Interpretation.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2011 - Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 5 (4):493-512.
The Intellect, Receptivity, and Material Singulars in Aquinas.Siobhan Nash-Marshall - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):371-388.
Receptivity and the will.Edward S. Hinchman - 2009 - Noûs 43 (3):395-427.
Curiosity as a Moral Virtue.Elias Baumgarten - 2001 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):169-184.
In Defense of the Moral Significance of Empathy.Aaron Simmons - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):97-111.
Scheler on Feeling and Values.Jonathan J. Sanford - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:165-181.
Empathy, Approval, and Disapproval in Moral Sentimentalism.Justin D'arms - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):134-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-26

Downloads
40 (#347,838)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Slote
University of Miami

Citations of this work

Altruism.Richard Kraut - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ethics, Adaptation, and the Anthropocene.Marion Hourdequin - 2021 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 24 (1):60-74.
Risk and Asymmetry in Development Ethics.Julian Jonker - 2020 - African Journal of Business Ethics 14 (1):23-41.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references