Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey
Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (4):210-214 (2012)
Abstract
Background In 2001 a report on the provision of clinical ethics support in UK healthcare institutions identified 20 clinical ethics committees. Since then there has been no systematic evaluation or documentation of their work at a national level. Recent national surveys of clinical ethics services in other countries have identified wide variation in practice and scope of activities. Objective To describe the current provision of ethics support in the UK and its development since 2001. Method A postal/electronic questionnaire survey administered to the chairs of all 82 clinical ethics services registered with the UK Clinical Ethics Network in July 2010. Results Response rate was 62% with the majority of responding services situated in acute trusts. All services included a clinical ethics committee with one service also having a clinical ethicist. Lay members were present in 72% of responding committees. Individual case consultation has increased since 2001 with 29% of chairs spending more than 50% of their time on this. Access to and involvement in the process of case consultation is less for patients and families than for clinical staff. There is wide variation in committee processes and levels of institutional support. Over half of the responding committees undertook some form of evaluation. Conclusion Clinical ethics services in the UK are increasing as is their involvement in case consultation. However, the significant variation in committee processes suggests that further qualitative research is needed to understand how these committees function and the role they play in their institutionAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.1136/medethics-2011-100173
My notes
Similar books and articles
Can UK Clinical Ethics Committees Improve Quality of Care?Leah McClimans, Anne-Marie Slowther & Michael Parker - 2012 - HEC Forum 24 (2):139-147.
Empirical assessments of clinical ethics services: implications for clinical ethics committees.Laura Williamson - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (4):187-192.
Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey.R. E. Lawrence & F. A. Curlin - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):214-218.
Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1--descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services.M. D. Godkin - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):505-512.
The UK Genethics Club: clinical ethics support for genetic services.Anneke Lucassen & Michael Parker - 2006 - Clinical Ethics 1 (4):219-223.
Patient involvement in clinical ethics services: from access to participation and membership.Gerald Neitzke - 2009 - Clinical Ethics 4 (3):146-151.
Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK.A. Slowther - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (90001):2i-8.
The practical importance of theory in clinical ethics support services.Bert Molewijk, Anne Slowther & Mark Aulisio - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (7):ii-iii.
From Reactive to Proactive: Developing a Valid Clinical Ethics Needs Assessment Survey to Support Ethics Program Strategic Planning (Part 1 of 2). [REVIEW]Andrea Frolic, Barb Jennings, Wendy Seidlitz, Sandy Andreychuk, Angela Djuric-Paulin, Barb Flaherty & Donna Peace - 2013 - HEC Forum 25 (1):47-60.
Theory and practice of clinical ethics support services: Narrative and hermeneutical perspectives.Rouven Porz, Elleke Landeweer & Guy Widdershoven - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (7):354-360.
Business Ethics Education for MBA Students in China: Current Status and Future Prospects.Zucheng Zhou, Ping Ou & Georges Enderle - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 6:103-118.
Ethics consultation in united states hospitals: A national survey.Ellen Fox, Sarah Myers & Robert A. Pearlman - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):13 – 25.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-12-14
Downloads
37 (#318,319)
6 months
1 (#455,921)
2011-12-14
Downloads
37 (#318,319)
6 months
1 (#455,921)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Do we understand the intervention? What complex intervention research can teach us for the evaluation of clinical ethics support services.Jan Schildmann, Stephan Nadolny, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Marjolein Gysels, Jochen Vollmann & Claudia Bausewein - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):48.
Clinical Ethics Support for Healthcare Personnel: An Integrative Literature Review.Dara Rasoal, Kirsti Skovdahl, Mervyn Gifford & Annica Kihlgren - 2017 - HEC Forum 29 (4):313-346.
Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees.Morten Magelssen, Reidar Pedersen, Ingrid Miljeteig, Håvard Ervik & Reidun Førde - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (2):66-70.
Implicit and Explicit Clinical Ethics Support in The Netherlands: A Mixed Methods Overview Study. [REVIEW]Linda Dauwerse, Froukje Weidema, Tineke Abma, Bert Molewijk & Guy Widdershoven - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (2):95-109.
Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations.Joe Brierley, David Archard & Emma Cave - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (8):549-552.
References found in this work
Ethics consultation in united states hospitals: A national survey.Ellen Fox, Sarah Myers & Robert A. Pearlman - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):13 – 25.
Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome. [REVIEW]Bert Molewijk, Maarten Verkerk, Henk Milius & Guy Widdershoven - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (1):43-56.
Evolution of hospital clinical ethics committees in Canada.A. Gaudine, L. Thorne, S. M. LeFort & M. Lamb - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):132-137.
What triggers requests for ethics consultations?G. DuVal - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 1):24-29.
Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1--descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services.M. D. Godkin - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):505-512.