Is There an Ecofeminism–Deep Ecology “Debate”?

Environmental Ethics 17 (2):151-169 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I discuss six problems with Warwick Fox’s “The Deep Ecology–Ecofeminism Debate and Its Parallels” and conclude that until Fox and some other deep ecologists take the time to study feminism and ecofeminist analyses, only disputes—not genuine debate—will occur between these two parties. An understanding of the six issues that I discuss is a precondition for such a debate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is there an ecofeminism–deep ecology “debate”?Deborah Slicer - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (2):151-169.
The Ecofeminism/Deep Ecology Debate.Ariel Kay Salleh - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (3):195-216.
Dōgen, Deep Ecology, and the Ecological Self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Dōgen, deep ecology, and the ecological self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Deep Anthropology.Alan E. Wittbecker - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270.
The New Ecological Order.Luc Ferry - 1995 - University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
31 (#504,675)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Deborah Slicer
University of Montana

Citations of this work

Identification with nature: What it is and why it matters.Christian Diehm - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (2):1-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references