Man not a subject for science?

Social Epistemology 4 (4):327 – 342 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Man and the science of man.William R. Coulson & Carl Ransom Rogers (eds.) - 1968 - Columbus, Ohio,: Merrill Pub. Co..
Can man be a subject for science?Harold Greenstein - 1971 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31 (4):585-596.
The world's great thinkers.Saxe Commins - 1947 - New York,: Random House. Edited by Robert N. Linscott.
Duns Scotus’s Account of a Propter Quid Science of the Categories.Lloyd Newton - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:145-160.
Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Social Studies of Science 33 (1):137-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
43 (#352,595)

6 months
12 (#178,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Slezak
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

The tripartite model of representation.Peter Slezak - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (3):239-270.
Thinking about thinking: Language, thought and introspection.Peter Slezak - 2002 - Language and Communication 22 (3):353-373.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.
Computing machinery and intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 1950 - Mind 59 (October):433-60.
Rules and representations.Noam Chomsky - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):1-15.

View all 15 references / Add more references