Theory and Decision 61 (3):277-303 (2006)

Peter Slezak
University of New South Wales
A fully adequate solution to Newcomb’s Problem (Nozick 1969) should reveal the source of its extraordinary elusiveness and persistent intractability. Recently, a few accounts have independently sought to meet this criterion of adequacy by exposing the underlying source of the problem’s profound puzzlement. Thus, Sorensen (1987), Slezak (1998), Priest (2002) and Maitzen and Wilson (2003) share the ‘no box’ view according to which the very idea that there is a right choice is misconceived since the problem is ill-formed or incoherent in some way. Among proponents of this view, Richard Jeffrey (2004) recently declared that he renounces his earlier position that accepted Newcomb problems as genuine decision problems. Significantly, Jeffrey suggests that “Newcomb problems are like Escher’s famous staircase on which an unbroken ascent takes you back where you started” (Jeffrey (2004; 113)). Jeffrey’s analogy is apt for a puzzle whose specific logical features can be precisely articulated. Along the lines of these related approaches, I propose to improve and clarify them by providing such a deeper analysis that elucidates their essential, related insights
Keywords Descartes’s demon  decision theory  Newcomb’s problem  paradoxes of self-reference
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11238-006-9002-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Decision.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1965 - New York, NY, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Blindspots.Roy A. Sorensen - 1988 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Rationality.Robert Nozick - 1993 - Princeton University Press.

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
108 ( #109,676 of 2,517,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,299 of 2,517,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes