Sensationalism versus news of the moral life: Making the distinction

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (1):5 – 15 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study argues that there is a moral dimension to sensational news. The study assumes that citizens have a moral interest in the community because moral standards play a role in governing social behavior. Some news, labeled as sensational, reflects news of the moral life of the community and is related to the community's moral well-being. This study addresses the problem of making the distinction between such news and news that is sensational for its own sake. This study also suggests a method that journalists can use to responsibly cover stories traditionally associated with press sensationalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#194,716)

6 months
16 (#148,627)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The virtuous journalist.Stephen Klaidman - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp.
The 'golden mean' in journalism.Sandra H. Dickson - 1988 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 3 (1):33 – 37.
Grounding an ethics of journalism.John P. Ferré - 1988 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 3 (1):18-27.

View all 7 references / Add more references