On the ambiguity of concept use in commentaries

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (2):115-125 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, we respond in general and specific terms to the commentaries written on our target article . In so doing, we revisit the motivation for our initial article and attempt to clarify certain aspects of our argument. Given that we were taken by some to be trying to undermine the Representational Theory of Mind , we discuss RTM in some detail. We also discuss Wittgenstein's methods and their relevance to the issues raised in our article and in the commentaries. 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Jaffray’s ideas on ambiguity.Peter P. Wakker - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (1):11-22.
A generalization of Specker's theorem on typical ambiguity.Richard Kaye - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):458-466.
What is an observable?Marian Grabowski - 1989 - Foundations of Physics 19 (7):923-930.
On religious ambiguity.Robert Mckim - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (4):373-392.
Restoring ambiguity to Achinstein's account of evidence.Steven Gimbel - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):269-285.
The stoics on ambiguity.Robert Blair Edlow - 1975 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (4):423-435.
Learning Chinese Philosophy with Commentaries.Tim Connolly - 2012 - Teaching Philosophy 35 (1):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
10 (#1,123,760)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references