Kaila's interpretation of Einstein-Minkowski invariance theory

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 93 (3):57-65 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explores Kaila's interpretation of the special theory of relativity. Although the relevance of his work to logical empiricism is well-known, not much has been written on what Kaila calls the ‘Einstein-Minkowski invariance theory’. Kaila's interpretation focuses on two salient features. First, he emphasizes the importance of the invariance of the spacetime interval. The general point about spacetime invariance has been known at least since Minkowski, yet Kaila applies his overall tripartite theory of invariances to space, time and spacetime in an original way. Second, Kaila provides a non-conventionalist argument for the isotropic speed of electromagnetic signals. The standard Einstein synchrony is not a mere convention but a part of a larger empirical theory. According to Kaila's holistic principle of testability, which stands in contrast to the theses of translatability and verification, different items in the theory cannot be sharply divided into conventional and empirical. Kaila's invariantism/non-conventionalism about relativity reflects an interesting case in the gradual transition from positivism to realism within the philosophy of science.

Similar books and articles

Realistic Claims in Logical Empiricism.Matthias Neuber - forthcoming - In Uskali Mäki, Stéphanie Ruphy, Gerhard Schurz & Ioannis Votsis (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Springer.
Kaila's Reception of Hume.Jani Hakkarainen - 2012 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 89:147-162.
Embedding Logical Empiricism into the History of Epistemology: Eino Kaila on Human Knowledge. [REVIEW]Elisabeth Nemeth - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):148-157.
Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence.Aulis Aarnio - 1983 - Helsinki: Academic Bookstore.
Realism and growth of knowledge—philosophy of science since Eino Kaila.Matti Sintonen - 2003 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (1):285-326.
On scientific and metaphysical explanation of reality (1926).Eino Kaila - 2003 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (1):49-67.
Scientific Realism and Constructive Empiricism.Alexander A. Pechenkin - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (2):179-191.
Invariance as a basis for necessity and laws.Gila Sher - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):3945-3974.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-25

Downloads
219 (#88,747)

6 months
88 (#47,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matias Kimi Slavov
Tampere University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. V. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20-43.
The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language.Rudolf Carnap - 1959 - In A. J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism. New York: The Free Press. pp. 60-81.
Time and physical geometry.Hilary Putnam - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (8):240-247.
Autobiographical Notes.Max Black, Albert Einstein & Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):157.

View all 14 references / Add more references