Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (3):559-571 (2014)
Abstract |
IntroductionHarm is a fundamental concept featuring in many normative claims. In the political context, it is sometimes argued that the only justification for state coercion is the prevention of harm to others, or that it is impermissible to forcibly prevent someone harming themselves. In ethics, many philosophers endorse weighty constraints against harming others. Finally, remedial duties in the civil law are usually conceptualised as responses to harm. Given its broad significance, the recent increase in attention to the philosophical foundations of harm is understandable, but there is still no consensus on even the broad outlines of a theory.Most theories of harm are ‘state-based’. They analyse harm with reference to the state in which a victim is placed as a result of some event: to be harmed is to be placed in a bad state. Events usually feature in state-based views as causes of harm, although the harm is not identified with this event or any further event. The event-based view (h
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10790-014-9433-1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Metaphysics of Harm.Matthew Hanser - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):421-450.
More On The Metaphysics of Harm.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):436-458.
The Metaphysics of Harm.Matthew Hanser - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):421-450.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Being Worse Off: But in Comparison with What? On the Baseline Problem of Harm and the Harm Principle.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):199-214.
Accounting for the Harm of Death.Duncan Purves - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):89-112.
A Defense of the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm.Justin Klocksiem - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):285 – 300.
Can Supervising Self-Harm Be Part of Ethical Nursing Practice?Steven D. Edwards & Jeanette Hewitt - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (1):79-87.
The Moral Status of Enabling Harm.Samuel C. Rickless - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):66-86.
Resolving Moral Dilemmas: A Case-Based Method. [REVIEW]Becky Cox White & Eric H. Gampel - 1996 - HEC Forum 8 (2):85-102.
What is the Harm Principle For?John Stanton-Ife - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (2):329-353.
A Criticism of the International Harm Principle.Massimo Renzo - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):267-282.
How Useful is the Concept of the ‘Harm Threshold’ in Reproductive Ethics and Law?Anna Smajdor - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (5):321-336.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-05-19
Total views
34 ( #337,335 of 2,519,502 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,502 )
2014-05-19
Total views
34 ( #337,335 of 2,519,502 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,502 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads