Eadem, sed aliter’: Arthur Schopenhauer as a Critic of ‘Progress

History of European Ideas 41 (7):931-947 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SummaryScholars have tended to overlook the political import of the ideas of Arthur Schopenhauer. This is perhaps unsurprising, since Schopenhauer himself was not a political philosopher and wrote relatively little about political matters. But Schopenhauer's near-silence on political topics should warrant our attention: why would a systematic philosopher, who made lasting contributions in metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics, devote so little attention to politics? Connecting his political thought with his philosophy of history, I argue that Schopenhauer can best be regarded as a critic of the idea of progress, especially ‘progress’ conceived of as national development or the growth of the state.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Geschichte: eadem, sed aliter.Gerhard Funke - 1987 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 68:13-23.
Gesammelte Briefe.Arthur Schopenhauer & Arthur Hübscher - 1983 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (2):315-317.
Arthur Schopenhauer as a Critic of History.Paul Gottfried - 1975 - Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (2):331.
A Metafísica da Música de Arthur Schopenhauer.Henry Burnett - 2012 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 57 (2):143-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-01

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

El irracionalismo es un pesimismo.Begoña Pessis García - 2023 - Claridades. Revista de Filosofía 15 (1):41-78.

Add more citations