The Frege-Geach objection to expressivism: still unanswered

Analysis 72 (1):9-18 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider a recent attempt by Mark Schroeder in his book Being For to provide an expressivist semantics for the connectives, and I argue that it does not, as it claims, answer the ‘Frege-Geach objection&rsquo

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problem with the Frege–Geach problem.Nate Charlow - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):635-665.
What is the Frege-Geach problem?Mark Schroeder - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):703-720.
Expressing Credences.Daniel Rothschild - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):99-114.
Quasi-realism, negation and the Frege-Geach problem.Nicholas Unwin - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):337-352.
Ascriptivism.P. T. Geach - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (2):221-225.
Unity and the Frege–Geach problem.Christopher Hom & Jeremy Schwartz - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):15-24.
Assertion.Peter Geach - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (4):449-465.
The Frege–Geach problem and Kalderon's moral fictionalism.Matti Eklund - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):705-712.
Divine hoorays: Some parallels between expressivism and religious ethics.Nicholas Unwin - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):659-684.
Norms and Negation: A Problem for Gibbard’s Logic.Nicholas Unwin - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):60-75.
The frege‐geach point.Paul Horwich - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):78–93.
Hybridizing Moral Expressivism and Moral Error Theory.Toby Svoboda - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (1):37-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-10

Downloads
260 (#71,173)

6 months
10 (#135,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Frege-Geach Problem.Jack Woods - 2017 - In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 226-242.
Skorupski on Being For.Mark Schroeder - 2012 - Analysis 72 (4):735-739.
Propositions First: Biting Geach's Bullet.M. J. Frápolli - 2019 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 86:87-110.
Reply to Schroeder on being for.J. Skorupski - 2013 - Analysis 73 (3):483-487.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Assertion.Peter Geach - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (4):449-465.
Quasi-realism, negation and the Frege-Geach problem.Nicholas Unwin - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):337-352.
Norms and Negation: A Problem for Gibbard’s Logic.Nicholas Unwin - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):60-75.

Add more references