Moral Deference and Authentic Interaction

Journal of Philosophy 113 (7):346-357 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article defends a mild form of pessimism about moral deference, by arguing that deference is incompatible with authentic interaction, that is, acting in a way that communicates our own normative judgment. The point of such interaction is ultimately that it allows us to get to know and engage one another. This vindication of our intuitive resistance to moral deference is upheld, in a certain range of cases, against David Enoch’s recent objection to views that motivate pessimism by appealing to moral autonomy or understanding. Enoch is right to point out that the value of autonomy or understanding cannot provide reason not to defer, if deferring would reduce the risk of treating others wrongly. But in the kind of case where we would want other people to act authentically towards us, even at the cost of a greater risk of wrongdoing, we should do the same towards them.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Moral Deference.David Enoch - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (5):229-258.
When to defer to supermajority testimony — and when not.Christian List - 2014 - In Jennifer Lackey (ed.), Essays in Collective Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 240-249.
Moral Deference and Deference to an Epistemic Peer.Cory Davia & Michele Palmira - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261):605-625.
Moral testimony and its authority.Philip Nickel - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):253-266.
Legal obligation as a duty of deference.Kimberley Brownlee - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (6):583 - 597.
Moral Testimony.Alison Hills - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):552-559.
Moral Expertise.Karen Jones & François Schroeter - 2012 - Analyse & Kritik 34 (2):217-230.
Respect for the dead and dying.Anthony Preus - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):409-416.
Comment on Karen Jones and François Schroeter.Alison Hills - 2012 - Analyse & Kritik 34 (2):231-236.
What is wrong with moral testimony?Robert Hopkins - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):611-634.
Saints, heroes, sages, and villains.Julia Markovits - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (2):289-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-03

Downloads
986 (#7,486)

6 months
80 (#12,593)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Knut Olav Skarsaune
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences

References found in this work

A Defense of Moral Deference.David Enoch - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (5):229-258.
In defense of moral testimony.Paulina Sliwa - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (2):175-195.
Moral testimony and its authority.Philip Nickel - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):253-266.

Add more references