A Commentary: Natascha H. Lancaster's, "minorities Versus Sartre's Saint Genet" And Loren Ringer's, "l'homosexuel Imaginaire: Sartre's Interpretive Grid In Saint Genet"

Sartre Studies International 6:36-45 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Readers of Sartre's biographies often have the impression that they reveal more about Sartre than about Baudelaire, Flaubert or Genet. The reason for this is our awareness of Sartre's philosophy which serves as an explicit paradigm for the construction and explicitation of his literary and his biographical works. We speak of a Sartrean play, a Sartrean biography, because they lay bare not only characteristic features of the genre but also of the author and this also is true of a Hegelian or Marxist history or a Freudian psychology. These writers have all invented their own paradigms and if one decides to use their paradigm one is considered a Hegelian, Marxist or Sartrean follower. These followers are judged by some to have been persuaded by a vision, a way of seeing, a style.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Women and Minorities vs. Sartre: Win, Win … Win!Natascha Lancaster - 2000 - Sartre Studies International 6:12-25.
Women and minorities vs. Sartre: Win, win … win!Natascha H. Lancaster - 2000 - Sartre Studies International 6 (2):12-25.
The Call to the Reader's Freedom in Jean-Paul Sartre's Literary Criticism.Heather Lancaster - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
4 (#1,599,757)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references