Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):215 – 231 (2007)
AbstractInternet plagiarism continues unabated and may even be increasing. Questions pertaining to the ethical-moral construct employed by students to justify Internet plagiarism among high school students have remained relatively untouched. Understanding not simply the prevalence of Internet plagiarism but also the variety of explanations used by students to justify their plagiarism seems crucial to curtailing its practice. In this study, I surveyed 160 high school students and endeavored to understand and describe the practices of students who use the Internet for schoolwork and who engage in copy-paste plagiarism or paper-buying practices. The results indicate that students are more easily able to justify copy-paste plagiarism for a variety of reasons that mirror justifications of other forms of conventional plagiarism. Most students indicated they would never purchase a paper for reasons ranging from fear of getting caught to more principled and nuanced ethical claims. Based on these results I also offer educators suggestions for refining assignments and evaluation methods.
Similar books and articles
Principled Autonomy and Plagiarism.Melinda Rosenberg - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (1):61-69.
Cultural Values, Plagiarism, and Fairness: When Plagiarism Gets in the Way of Learning.Niall Hayes & Lucas D. Introna - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):213 – 231.
Is There an Effective Approach to Deterring Students From Plagiarizing?Lidija Bilic-Zulle, Josip Azman, Vedran Frkovic & Mladen Petrovecki - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):139-147.
Effects of Personality and Information Technology on Plagiarism: An Iranian Perspective.Babak Sohrabi, Aryan Gholipour & Neda Mohammadesmaeili - 2011 - Ethics and Behavior 21 (5):367 - 379.
Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors From Students' Perspective. [REVIEW]Jaume Sureda-Negre - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):217-232.
Does Moral Judgment Go Offline When Students Are Online? A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduates' Beliefs and Behaviors Related to Conventional and Digital Cheating.Jason M. Stephens, Michael F. Young & Thomas Calabrese - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):233 – 254.
Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-Use?Tracey Bretag & Saadia Mahmud - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):193-205.
Technology and Academic Virtue: Student Plagiarism Through the Looking Glass. [REVIEW]Cynthia Townley & Mitch Parsell - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):271-277.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A Systematic Review Into the Psychological Causes and Correlates of Plagiarism.Simon A. Moss, Barbara White & Jim Lee - 2018 - Ethics and Behavior 28 (4):261-283.
Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward Plagiarism and Factors Contributing to Plagiarism: A Review of Studies. [REVIEW]Fauzilah Md Husain, Ghayth Kamel Shaker Al-Shaibani & Omer Hassan Ali Mahfoodh - 2017 - Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (2):167-195.
Contract Cheating: A New Challenge for Academic Honesty?Mary Walker & Cynthia Townley - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (1):27-44.
Are We on the Same Page? College Students’ and Faculty’s Perception of Student Plagiarism in Taiwan.Yinlan Chen & Chien Chou - 2017 - Ethics and Behavior 27 (1):53-73.
Toward an Analytical Model of Ethical Decision Making in Plagiarism.Gervas K. K. Lau, Allan H. K. Yuen & Jae Park - 2013 - Ethics and Behavior 23 (5):360-377.
References found in this work
Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research.Kenneth D. Butterfield, Linda Klebe Trevino & Donald L. McCabe - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):219-232.
Does Academic Dishonesty Relate to Unethical Behavior in Professional Practice? An Exploratory Study.Donald D. Carpenter, Trevor S. Harding, Cynthia J. Finelli & Honor J. Passow - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):311-324.
Moral Identities, Social Anxiety, and Academic Dishonesty Among American College Students.Scott A. Wowra - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):303 – 321.
Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors.Miguel Roig - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):307-323.
Context, Values and Moral Dilemmas: Comparing the Choices of Business and Law School Students. [REVIEW]Donald L. McCabe, Janet M. Dukerich & Jane E. Dutton - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (12):951 - 960.