Rethinking learning and development in the Newell test

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):619-620 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Newell Test is an ambitious and promising project, but not without pitfalls. Some of the current criteria are not theoretically neutral, whereas others are unhelpful. To improve the test, the learning and development criteria are reviewed and revised, which suggests adding a maturation criterion as well. Such changes should make the Newell Test more general and useful

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Contemporary Significance of Confucianism.Tang Yijie & Yan Xin - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):477-501.
The hardest test for a theory of cognition: The input test.Asim Roy - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):618-619.
How Bad Is Rape?H. E. Baber - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (2):125-138.
The Hiddenness Argument Revisited.J. L. Schellenberg - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
Poppering the Newell test.Niels A. Taatgen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):621-622.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#686,422)

6 months
1 (#1,478,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references