Response

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):243-244 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The offer of the fast food company gives rise to suspicion. This seems to be based on unfounded stereotypes, however. This paper argues that we need to preserve choices in taking particular courses of action. There is nothing inherently wrong in fast food consumption so long as consumers are made aware of the importance of weight management and proper nutrition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rewarding performance feedback alters reported time of action.Eve A. Isham & Joy J. Geng - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1577-1585.
Food Citizenship: Is There a Duty for Responsible Consumption? [REVIEW]Johan De Tavernier - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):895-907.
Behavioral momentum: Issues of generality.Steven L. Cohen - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):95-96.
Food Insecurity in Pakistan: Causes and Policy Response. [REVIEW]S. Akhtar Ali Shah - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):493-509.
Food Insecurity in Pakistan: Causes and Policy Response. [REVIEW]Mohammad Aslam Khan & S. Akhtar Ali Shah - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):493-509.
Taking consumers seriously: Two concepts of consumer sovereignty. [REVIEW]Michiel Korthals - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):201-215.
Response.Sarah Jane Toledano & Leonardo D. de Castro - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):241-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#682,951)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references