Value Judgments: Value Judgments and Normative Claims

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 24:145-172 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A person's values are what that person regards as or thinks important; a society's values are what that society regards as important. A society's values are expressed in laws and legislatively enacted policies, in its mores, social habits, and positive morality. Any body's values—an individual person's or a society's—are subject to change, and in our time especially. An individual manifests his or her values in expressions of approval or disapproval, of admiration or disdain, by seeking or avoidance behaviour, and by his or her characteristic activities. What one values one seeks for or tries to maintain. Sometimes attaining it leads to unexpected enlightenment—that isn't what one wanted after all. But a person's values are discovered most significantly in a reflective way by becoming aware of what one is willing to give up to attain or maintain one's values. This is the price one is willing to pay for it, and values are occasionally, and in the money and stock markets always, expressed in terms of price. This can be significant or it can be misleading; it depends on how it is interpreted. Not everything has a monetary equivalent, despite the attempts of the law to provide recovery for damages in monetary terms, and despite the cynical maxim, ‘Everyone has his price’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metaphysics and morals.T. M. Scanlon - 2010 - In Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. Columbia University Press. pp. 7 - 22.
Improving moral judgments: Philosophical considerations.Annemarie Kalis - 2010 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 30 (2):94-108.
Meta‐normative Realism, Evolution, and Our Reasons to Survive.Jeff Behrends - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (4):486-502.
Qualitative Judgments, Quantitative Judgments, and Norm-Sensitivity.Paul Egré - 2010 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 33 (4):335-336.
The metaethicists' mistake.Ralph Wedgwood - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):405–426.
Moral motivation.Connie S. Rosati - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Quine on Ethics.Folke Tersman - 1998 - Theoria 64 (1):84-98.
Science and values: Are value judgments always irrelevant to the justification of scientific claims?Kristen Intemann - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S506-.
Philosophy of law.Paul Sayre - 1954 - Littleton, Colo.: F.B. Rothman.
Value Judgments: How to Reason About Value Judgments.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 24:173-190.
Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's theory of taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Contextualism, relativism and ordinary speakers' judgments.Martin Montminy - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):341 - 356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
25 (#618,847)

6 months
13 (#184,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen R. L. Clark
University of Liverpool

References found in this work

Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1922 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
Principia Ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - International Journal of Ethics 14 (3):377-382.
The Moral Judgment of the Child.Jean Piaget - 1934 - Mind 43 (169):85-99.
Reason and Morality.Alan Gewirth - 1968 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 170 (4):444-445.

View all 15 references / Add more references