On Cantor's concept of set

International Logic Review 32:72-78 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Cantor’s Concept of Set in the Light of Plato’s Philebus.Kai Hauser - 2010 - Review of Metaphysics 63 (4):783-805.
Natural Numbers and Infinitesimals: A Discussion between Benno Kerry and Georg Cantor.Carlo Proietti - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):343-359.
Rank, join, and Cantor singletons.Jim Owings - 1997 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 36 (4-5):313-320.
Wittgenstein’s analysis on Cantor’s diagonal argument.Chaohui Zhuang - manuscript
x2. Cantor's proof. The authors of these papers—henceforth let me call them just the authors—seem to have read Cantor's argument in a variety of places. In my records only one author refers directly to Cantor's own argument [7]. One quotes Russell's 'Principles of mathematics'[20] later. [REVIEW]Wilfrid Hodges - 1998 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):1-16.
Cantor on Frege's Foundations of Arithmetic : Cantor's 1885 Review of Frege's Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik.Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (4):341-348.
Cantor and the Burali-Forti Paradox.Christopher Menzel - 1984 - The Monist 67 (1):92-107.
Against Angels and the Fregean-Cantorian Theory of Number.Andrew Boucher - unknown
Cohesive toposes and Cantor's 'lauter einsen'.F. W. Lawvere - 1994 - Philosophia Mathematica 2 (1):5-15.
Constructing Cantorian counterexamples.George Boolos - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (3):237-239.
Did Georg Cantor influence Edmund Husserl?Claire Ortiz Hill - 1997 - Synthese 113 (1):145-170.
The 'great struggle' between Cantorians and neo-aristotelians: Much ado about nothing.Miloš Arsenijević & Miodrag Kapetanović - 2008 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):79-90.
Taming the infinite.A. W. Moore - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):53-56.
Cantor's grundlagen and the paradoxes of set theory.William Tait - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-13

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How “rational” is “rationality”?Daniël F. M. Strauss - 2003 - South African Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):247-266.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references