Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):448–456 (2008)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
This précis summarizes my book Moral Skepticisms, with emphasis on my contrastivist analysis of justified moral belief and my Pyrrhonian moral scepticism based on meta-scepticism about relevance. This complex moral epistemology escapes a common paradox facing moral philosophers.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.553.x |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Problems for Sinnott-Armstrong's Moral Contrastivism.Peter Baumann - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):463–470.
A Dilemma for Sinnott-Armstrong's Moderate Pyrrhonian Moral Scepticism.Gerry Hough - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):457–462.
Similar books and articles
Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts.David Archard - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):119-127.
Scepticism, Relativism and the Argument From the Criterion.Howard Sankey - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
Replies to Hough, Baumann and Blaauw.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):478-488.
The Problem of Evil and Moral Scepticism.Brice R. Wachterhauser - 1985 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 17 (3):167 - 174.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
122 ( #94,640 of 2,499,613 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,169 of 2,499,613 )
2009-01-28
Total views
122 ( #94,640 of 2,499,613 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,169 of 2,499,613 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
