Can Habitus Explain Individual Particularities? Critically Appreciating the Operationalization of Relational Logic in Field Theory

Sociological Theory 40 (1):28-50 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bourdieu’s concept of habitus claims to solve the problem of the individual/society duality. However, the concept of habitus appears to be inadequate to explain the idiosyncratic features of individual field actors’ practices. In this article, I argue that to explain the particularity of individual habitus, we must appreciate the operationalization of relational logic in field theory. I further argue that individuals learn to prediscursively identify certain types of practices as meaningful for a given field position because of their embodied experiences of movements within the historically specific relational structure of the field. Thus, the same individual can exhibit multiple and even contradictory practices depending on the person’s relational position in the field. I illustrate this insight by discussing the political habitus of the first prime minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Education as habitus transformations.Florian von Rosenberg - 2016 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 48 (14):1486-1496.
Sociology Is a Martial Art.Elise Paradis - 2014 - Body and Society 20 (2):100-105.
Habitual Reflexivity and Skilled Action.John Toner - 2017 - Body and Society 23 (4):3-26.
The Habitus of Choice.Olivier Boulnois - 2018 - In Nicolas Faucher & Magali Roques (eds.), The Ontology, Psychology and Axiology of Habits (Habitus) in Medieval Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 25-45.
The Subjectivity of Habitus.Bret Chandler - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (4):469-491.
Power Freedom and Relational Autonomy.Ericka Tucker - 2021 - In Aurelia Armstrong, Keith Green & Andrea Sangiacomo (eds.), Spinoza and Relational Autonomy. Edinburgh, UK: pp. 149-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-07

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Substance and Function & Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.Ernst Cassirer - 1910 - London,: The Open court publishing company. Edited by William Curtis Swabey & Marie Collins Swabey.
The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature.Pierre Bourdieu & Randal Johnson - 1996 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (1):88-90.
The social space and the genesis of groups.Pierre Bourdieu - 1985 - Theory and Society 14 (6):723-744.
The phenomenological habitus and its construction.Nick Crossley - 2001 - Theory and Society 30 (1):81-120.

View all 11 references / Add more references